Collections

Project Description: Connect customer payment inquiries to account records so AI can prepare reply drafts. Collections staff review and send responses, with disputes routed for further investigation.

Implementation effort

120–464staff hours total

Current workload

—staff hours / month

Net time saved

—staff hours / month

Project difficulty

Moderate

Implementation work

Define supported inquiries and reply controls16–56h
  • Define five inquiry types, identity checks and approved reply content; distinguish routine requests from disputes.
  • Assign reply approvers and escalation owners; agree what account information the workflow may disclose.
Sources
Connect the inbox and customer records24–96h
  • Connect one shared inbox and a read-only customer/invoice source; verify account identifiers and data freshness.
  • Label 100 historical inquiries and expected responses; keep development and test cases separate.
Sources
Configure reply drafting and escalation32–128h
  • Route supported inquiries and draft replies using the relevant customer's account records.
  • Include account references and an activity record; require staff approval and escalate disputes.
Sources
Test account accuracy and data access32–128h
  • Test disputed balances, missing records and misleading requests; check that customers cannot see each other's information.
  • Rehearse reviewer decisions, correct failed responses and rerun the affected cases.
Sources
Train collectors and launch16–56h
  • Train up to five staff to verify drafts, approve replies and escalate exceptions; document manual fallback.
  • Monitor a bounded live pilot and resolve remaining issues before release.
Sources

Ongoing work

Maintain collections workflows40–160h / yr
  • Sample draft quality and account-data freshness; update supported responses and source mappings.
  • Retest customer isolation, permissions and escalation after source, ERP or model changes.
Citations
Further projects
  • Extend replies to additional entities, languages or inquiry types.
  • Add payment-pattern analysis to investigate recurring disputes or delays.

Organization assumptions

Organization size

Estimated finance staffing: ≈19 FTE

Workload estimatesAvg. staff hours/month
Changes across projects
How adjustments work
  • Existing systems, data, procedures and skills change the implementation tasks.
  • Workflow automation and exceptions change the current workload and potential time savings.
  • Adjustment sizes are planning assumptions. Case-study results stay unchanged.
  • Shared setup is counted once on the shared foundation project; upkeep remains.
View assumptions and task mappings ↗